Here's today's scientific proof of God. Why is it wrong? First because it has a shameless little shimmy in the middle: it talks about "the chances of a Being Like God evolving". What does this mean? What is a being like God? Unfortunately this Proof doesn't tell us, beyond speculating that God is some kind of Cosmic Duck (I kid you not!) And second, it fails because this "proof" by the strong/weak/puny anthropic principle is not a proof of anything - it's a wild speculation.
As always, the email is on its way to ask for this proof to be deleted in the interests of reason and basic honesty. As always, we're not holding our breath. It's quackers out there.
1 comment:
The duck looks silly.
pls check out skeptical podcast number 88 on your quest to relieve backpain.
Post a Comment